Description:
This week we talk to work upon what
we have. To build a character for example we had to see what the actor could
give to it and then choose how the character must be.
Analysis:
It’s already a challenge to think
how would you like things to be, you imagine for the set design, the structure
and the acting certain things and then you have to face that somethings are not
possible. For the acting for example in the play we want the eyes to be
wide open but when I asked and tried to do this with the form 2 actors many
couldn’t do it. I had to spend a lot of time just to fix this because is one of
the important aspects of the acting, but then there where one or two actors who
just couldn’t do it… what will happen with this actor? What happens when an
actor can’t follow a convention?
Then for the set design I’m doing
lighting, and i have many ideas of what can be done, the shadows, the effects,
etc. But then when I think on the theatre we have I just realize this is not
possible. The stage gives a lot of limitations on this, but I think that
hopefully with the projections this would work better… anyway the shape of our
theatre its already a challenge. We have to work with what we have, but
sometimes these limitations don’t let you follow conventions. So what will
happen if you have to break a convention because it’s just not possible to
follow it? Is it acceptable? I know that for the school play we are doing an
adaptation of german expressionism and using projections rather than shadows
will not be negative for the play as the effect created is similar, but in
other occasions? Can the limitations of the stage break with conventions?
Connections:
In Hebras for example we can see that in the floor there are lines, but what would happen if that is performed in a theatre as the one in school, where the stage is higher than the audience level. The audience will not be able to see those lines, the “convention” will have to be broken.
In Hebras for example we can see that in the floor there are lines, but what would happen if that is performed in a theatre as the one in school, where the stage is higher than the audience level. The audience will not be able to see those lines, the “convention” will have to be broken.
Reflexion:
I know that in the beginning we
must work with what we got, but what happens later, when the play needs to
adapt to another stage or the conventions for acting can’t be accomplished by
an actor? Are we supposed to ignore this? To what extent limitations will
change the effect created in the audience?
Your entry is superficial, since you do not analyze and further discuss the limitations that you find. Rather than pointing out the negative aspects, you should try and propose solutions to the challenges that appear on the way.
ResponderEliminarRoberto